Rank 2 of 7
Brainpool AI
What is Brainpool AI?
A buyer holding an approved pilot wants to know what the next invoice looks like and who will be in the room when the prototype meets production data. Brainpool AI answers more of that in public than most firms in this guide.
In this article
Brainpool AI at the point where a pilot has to become a system
A buyer holding an approved pilot wants to know what the next invoice looks like and who will be in the room when the prototype meets production data. Brainpool AI answers more of that in public than most firms in this guide. It sets out its work as a sequence (scoping, prototyping, implementation, then continuous improvement)1, and it attaches pound figures to two of those steps2,3. Its self-description is professional consulting across artificial intelligence and machine learning4. London is its global base, and 2017 its founding year5.
One caution on sources before going further. Brainpool's homepage blocked automated requests on the day we checked6, so this profile is built from the long text file the firm publishes for language models. That file is detailed, though it is the firm's own summary of itself.
The people behind a delivery
Two executives are named. Peter Holroyd leads the company as CEO7, while Kasia Borowska runs product8. Brainpool says it can call on a pool of over five hundred people drawn from academic research and machine learning engineering9, many holding a doctorate or master's degree10. For a production build that hits an awkward modelling problem, access to that pool is a genuine asset. What share of it is employed staff, and what share is a looser network, is not publicly stated on the pages we opened.
Searchers should know one quirk of the name. The firm's own text points out that it has nothing to do with Brainpool, the elliptic curve standard from cryptography11, so procurement searches may surface unrelated results.
Stage by stage, with prices
The staging is what earns Brainpool its place in this guide.
**Scoping.** Strategy work runs as a programme of workshops and analysis, typically four to six weeks long12. The consultancy offer as a whole covers evaluating, planning and deploying AI for an organisation13.
**Prototype.** Next comes a feasibility test, sold at a fixed price and lasting the same four to six weeks, under the name Proof of Concept Factory14. Budget for that prototype runs from £15,000 to £35,0002.
**Enterprise MVP.** The jump to something an enterprise can run is a custom MVP on Cortex, quoted between £50,000 and £200,0003. Cortex is middleware the firm owns, aimed at automation powered by AI15, and it is deliberately free of ties to any one model vendor or cloud16. Where the work involves large language models, Brainpool also offers custom GPT and LLM builds, with bespoke retrieval pipelines among the deliverables17.
**Improvement.** The lifecycle ends in continuous improvement1. What that phase includes, whether support hours, response targets or a monthly fee, is not publicly stated on the pages we opened.
No other consultancy in this guide publishes prices for both a prototype and an MVP. Here a finance team can see both bands side by side2,3 and set aside the second budget before the first is spent.
Data location and ownership
Two answers that usually arrive late in procurement are on the record early. Brainpool's security argument is architectural: Cortex goes into the client's own cloud environment18. On ownership, the client ends up holding the intellectual property outright in every proprietary asset Brainpool produces for it19. A data protection officer and a legal team will both want those points in writing, and here they already are.
Security credentials are framed as alignment. The text speaks of work supported by AWS partner tracks and ISO 27001 governance boundaries20, and of Cortex aligning with Cyber Essentials, ISO 27001 and the AWS Advanced Partner track21. We found no certificate number, issuer or scope for any of these, so they belong on the due diligence list.
Systems that reached users
Brainpool's case list includes several systems that went beyond a pilot.
1. **DAISY**, a design tool developed in partnership with the Staircraft Group, whose floors and staircases make it Europe's biggest producer in that market by Brainpool's description22. A structural timber design used to occupy a designer for upwards of three hours; Brainpool reports that DAISY gets it done in under ten minutes23. 2. **Creed**, an app for people to follow their own carbon footprint, which Brainpool built end to end for a young green fintech24. It shipped to the Apple and Google app stores as a product regulated by the FCA25. 3. **FX forecasting** for a top-tier Japanese investment bank that is not named, where accuracy rose from 52 to 56 percent26. 4. **Crown and Paw**, where a computer vision pipeline for custom portraits is credited with $365,000 of savings each year27. 5. **HSBC SME cash flow prediction**, listed by title, though the case body was missing from our saved copy28.
Creed matters most for this guide. A consumer app released under FCA regulation in public app stores has gone well beyond a demonstration25.
Sectors
Its target clients come in four groups, which are construction companies, retail chains, banks and other financial institutions, and mid-sized partnerships in professional services29. Regulation shows up in its sector pages, with the MHRA mentioned for healthcare30 and RICS rules for property scoping31.
Strengths for the pilot to production stage
1. Prices in pounds for both the prototype and the enterprise MVP2,3. 2. A lifecycle that names a phase after implementation1. 3. Cortex hosted in the client's cloud18, with the IP handed over19. 4. An FCA-regulated app in public stores as proof of delivery25.
Limits a buyer should test
1. Only the prototype carries a fixed price14; the MVP spans a fourfold range3, so scoping drives the real figure. 2. Its security claims rest on alignment wording, with no certificate visible in the file we saved20,21. 3. Both the homepage and the Clutch profile refused our automated requests6,32. 4. Training for end users after launch is not publicly stated on the pages we opened.
How it compares with Nexus
Both firms treat the proof of concept as the door to production. They differ in what happens at that door. Brainpool sells each stage as a priced project2,3. Nexus makes the pilot itself the first production run, since its opening agent is live after four weeks and the proof of concept lasts three months; after that, each automated role is priced, while consultant time and daily rates stay off the invoice33. Consultancy support during rollout is included in that software price33. A buyer who likes fixed project budgets will find Brainpool's bands useful. A buyer who wants production to begin inside the pilot, and to pay by the roles automated, will prefer Nexus33, and that is the reason it ranks first here.